mm509: Hear that sound? It’s the ice skaters in hell!

© Associated Press photo by Byron Rollins

© Associated Press photo by Byron Rollins

We’ve written before about our hometown newspaper, the Chicago Tribune.

Taken most seriously in its home town.

But proud of its Republican tradition. Its first editor of any distinction, Joseph Medill, was influential in winning the presidency for Abraham Lincoln.

That Republican heritage caused it to be newspaper non grata in my grandparents’ and my parents’ households, and indeed, our household for many years, until its more favored tabloid competitor, the once scrappy and progressive Sun-Times, was eviscerated by Rupert Murdoch, the first of a series of newspaper bandits that have effectively destroyed it. The latest in that series, Conrad Black, is in federal prison, convicted of fraud in connection with his newspaper properties.

But we digress.

The Tribune is <so> Republican that once, the year yr (justifiably) humble svt was born, they allowed wishful thinking to trump reality, resulting in the headline illustrated at the top of this post, a photograph that Wikipedia rightfully describes as one of the most famous ever published.

That was then.

Times, even for the 161 year old Chicago Tribune, have changed.



Tribune endorsement: Barack Obama for president

2:33 PM CDT, October 17, 2008

However this election turns out, it will dramatically advance America’s slow progress toward equality and inclusion. It took Abraham Lincoln’s extraordinary courage in the Civil War to get us here. It took an epic battle to secure women the right to vote. It took the perseverance of the civil rights movement. Now we have an election in which we will choose the first African-American president . . . or the first female vice president.

In recent weeks it has been easy to lose sight of this history in the making. Americans are focused on the greatest threat to the world economic system in 80 years. They feel a personal vulnerability the likes of which they haven’t experienced since Sept. 11, 2001. It’s a different kind of vulnerability. Unlike Sept. 11, the economic threat hasn’t forged a common bond in this nation. It has fed anger, fear and mistrust.

On Nov. 4 we’re going to elect a president to lead us through a perilous time and restore in us a common sense of national purpose.

The strongest candidate to do that is Sen. Barack Obama. The Tribune is proud to endorse him today for president of the United States.

Do you get it yet?

In over 160 years, forty (40!) elections, the Tribune has NEVER endorsed a Democrat for president in a general election.

Until today.

It’s an open question how influential newspapers, and more specifically, their endorsements, are with today’s voters. Newspapers are no longer the king of all media that they were in the days before electronic journalism.

But as a symbol of the utter bankruptcy of the Republican party, its candidates, Mad Capt. McCain and the Redneckette, and indeed, this country after eight years of George III’s misrule, this endorsement of Barack Obama is a telling indictment.

The Republican Party, the party of limited government, has lost its way. The government ran a $237 billion surplus in 2000, the year before Bush took office — and recorded a $455 billion deficit in 2008. The Republicans lost control of the U.S. House and Senate in 2006 because, as we said at the time, they gave the nation rampant spending and Capitol Hill corruption. They abandoned their principles. They paid the price.

We might have counted on John McCain to correct his party’s course. We like McCain. We endorsed him in the Republican primary in Illinois. In part because of his persuasion and resolve, the U.S. stands to win an unconditional victory in Iraq.

It is, though, hard to figure John McCain these days. He argued that President Bush’s tax cuts were fiscally irresponsible, but he now supports them. He promises a balanced budget by the end of his first term, but his tax cut plan would add an estimated $4.2 trillion in debt over 10 years. He has responded to the economic crisis with an angry, populist message and a misguided, $300 billion proposal to buy up bad mortgages.

McCain failed in his most important executive decision. Give him credit for choosing a female running mate–but he passed up any number of supremely qualified Republican women who could have served. Having called Obama not ready to lead, McCain chose Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin. His campaign has tried to stage-manage Palin’s exposure to the public. But it’s clear she is not prepared to step in at a moment’s notice and serve as president. McCain put his campaign before his country.

Tribune endorses Barack Obama for president

Now, I’m sure some of my friends and readers (you, too, Mr. M) will make the obvious connection of the Tribune‘s famous error at the top of this post, and today’s endorsement. “Hey, they’ve been famously wrong before!”

And there’s no denying two other salient facts: Barack Obama is a home town hero; and the Tribune’s new owner is Sam Zell, a billionaire real estate guy, and bottom feeding investor, although his political views hitherto have seemed to lean toward Republican candidates and causes.

The important difference between 1948 and 2008: there’s no wishful thinking in this endorsement.

Just hopeful thinking.

And it’s fun to imagine Col. McCormick spinning in his grave.

It’s it for now. Thanks.


Add to FacebookAdd to NewsvineAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Furl


7 Responses to mm509: Hear that sound? It’s the ice skaters in hell!

  1. curly says:

    Here in Britain we are finding it hard to take the McCain/Palin campaign seriously. Their image has been damaged in recent weeks (but we don’t like Obama much either!)

    What a rotten choice you have.

  2. mudge says:

    Au contraire, curly! This is the first presidential election in many years where such a clear choice exists: principles vs. none; (relative) youth vs. grizzly age; oratory vs. mud-slinging. I can’t wait to cast my ballot! Thanks for adding to the discourse.

  3. sally says:

    I agree with you…I am mystified why people say there is NO difference between Obama and McCain. My best guess is that people are cynical and DO NOT TRUST politicians, any politician! I usually agree with that sentiment but Obama has shown me and time and time again that he is worthy of the title Politician and not the used car salesman most show themselves as.

  4. mudge says:

    Yes, Sally, this is a very different election year. The problems the next president faces, thanks to the corruption and dead-end ideology of eight years of George III, are all but insurmountable, but I have a feeling, stronger than hope, that Barack Obama is up to the challenge. Thanks so much for contributing!

  5. zook music says:

    zook music…

    […]mm509: Hear that sound? It’s the ice skaters in hell! « Left-handed Complement[…]…

  6. I recently came across your blog and have been reading along.The information in this site seems to be interesting…

  7. arabian ranches…

    […]mm509: Hear that sound? It’s the ice skaters in hell! « Left-handed Complement[…]…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s