mm204: Wind power — Ugly, noisy, destructive! Who knew?

MUDGE’S Musings

Twice within a couple of these holiday weekend days the NYTimes has featured stories on power generated by modern wind turbines.

Quite intriguing, really, the theory that power can be produced without burning fossil fuels, without creating 2billion years of hazardous nuclear waste, without the variability of the winter’s snowfall (influenced lately by drought).

Just throw up a few huge turbine blades and let Mother Nature take over.

Well, of course it’s hardly that simple. As the pair of stories make clear, no work of man is without controversy, and wind farms are apparently not as benign as proponents have long claimed.

First, from Sweden:

swedenwind

By MARK LANDLER

MALMO, Sweden — Steadying himself on the heaving foredeck of an inspection ship recently, his face flecked by spray, Arne Floderus pronounced it a good day for his new offshore wind farm.

A 30-mile-an-hour wind was twirling the fingerlike blades of a turbine 380 feet above his head. Around him, a field of turbines rotated in a synchronized ballet that, when fully connected to an electrical grid, would generate enough power to light 60,000 nearby houses.

“We’ve created a new landmark,” said Mr. Floderus, the project manager of the $280 million wind park, one of the world’s largest, which was built by the Swedish power company Vattenfall.

The park, in a shallow sound between Sweden and Denmark, testifies to the remarkable rise of wind energy — no longer a quirky alternative favored by environmentalists in Denmark and Germany, but a mainstream power source used in 26 nations, including the United States.

Yet Sweden’s gleaming wind park is entering service at a time when wind energy is coming under sharper scrutiny, not just from hostile neighbors, who complain that the towers are a blot on the landscape, but from energy experts who question its reliability as a source of power.

So the wind doesn’t blow 24/7/52… who knew? And it turns out that people no more want wind farms next door than they do coal powered generation plants or Three Mile Island. The concept is called NIMBY. Not in my back yard. The elemental conflict between private property rights and the greater good.

NIMBY often wins.

[Please click the link below for the complete article — but then please come on back!]

Sweden Turns to a Promising Power Source, With Flaws – New York Times

Our second Times tale comes from Greece:

greecewind4

By JOANNA KAKISSIS | Published: November 25, 2007

THE tiny Greek island of Serifos, a popular tourist destination, depends on its postcard views of sandy beaches, Cycladic homes and sunsets that blend sea and sky into a clean wash of color. So when a mining and energy company floated a plan earlier this year to build 87 industrial wind turbines on more than a third of the island, the Serifos mayor, Angeliki Synodinou, called it her “worst nightmare.”

Greece primarily depends on “brown coal,” a particularly dirty variety that emits much pollution. So wind power has seemed an attractive alternative.

But the huge turbines do catch the eye, and nearby they are considerably noisy.

[Please click the link below for the complete article — but then please come on back!]

Debating the Merits of Energy From Air – New York Times

MUDGE‘s first exposure to such objects in any quantity, i.e., a true wind farm as opposed to the occasional country turbine, eye-catching and modern and jarring in a rural landscape though it was, was in Southern California.

Along I-10 just west of Palm Springs is a pass through the mountains featuring what seemed like hundreds of turbines, atop ridges, in valleys, looking like nothing ever seen before. Looked it up today; the farm is called the San Gorgonio Pass, one of several such projects in California. Truly stunning.

But, then again, it’s out there in the desert, next to virtually nothing but the occasional trailer park and chameleon. According to the California Energy Commission, at the time the article was published (2003?), San Gorgonio consisted of more than 2,500 huge turbines.

Breezing along (as it were) the interstate at 79mph, one doesn’t hear them. But they do make a lasting visual impression.

Would I want such an installation in a lake near me? Ugly? Noisy? Destructive?

Given a choice between that, and the nukes that pepper the region that MUDGE calls home (eagerly received by a power-hungry public 50 years ago), can you doubt my response?

It’s it for now. Thanks,

–MUDGE

Advertisements

8 Responses to mm204: Wind power — Ugly, noisy, destructive! Who knew?

  1. […] we move from fuel cells to wind generation, a recent topic in this space. here for […]

  2. salvatore forzisi says:

    Procedure of loading batteries of an electrical vehicle by Aeolic system

    The recharges of batteries, which supplies energy to the electric motor of a vehicle, will be carried out through an Aeolic System composed by the following elements:

    -rotor

    -generator,

    -controller with load

    -rectifier

    The vehicle, being left over, will always have some air amount whose speed will be directly propertional to the same speed of the vehicle.

    The air will enter in the autobody by the embrasures placed in the frontal part of the vehicle, and it will canalized towards the rotores.

    The rotores could be one or more and they will be placed inside the auto body in a way not to hinder the advance of the vehicle creating friction.

    The Permanent Magnet Generator (PMG) concurs of extracting the maximum

    power by the rotor.

    The controller with loads serves to prevent the damaging of the batteries.

    The generated current will be “alternating current trifase” (AC) and will be converted from the rectifier in “direct current” (DC).

    The generator, the controllers electronics, the rectifier and the batteries will be placed into the vehicle.

    The direct current, finally, will be canalized, by a power cable , towards the batteries and it will recharge to them.

    It will be also possible to load the batteries when the vehicle is stopped.

    This is possible because the wind, investing the car from several points, will be put towards a rotor that will create described energy.

    Purposes of the plan and advantages:

    * to produce energy to cost 0 and 0 emissions, bringing a remarkable

    economic, ecological and social advantage.

    * the energy produced in march feeds the same march of the vehicle and there is no need to stop for the refueling.

    * development of an innovative system based on rotators and generators placed into the autobody.

    We are looking for patnership

    cav. Salvatore Forzisi

    via bezzecca 2

    40139 Bologna

    tel.(+39) 051 6233600

    mobile(+39) 3465048310

    http://energy1953.blogspot.com/

  3. […] has covered alternative energy a number of times, and wind power specifically, most recently here and […]

  4. […] Complement has covered alternative energy several times (here, here, here and here for […]

  5. Syble Guzzo says:

    Thats good stuff you written up on this blog. Had been searching for it all over. good blog

  6. gametrainers.org…

    […]mm204: Wind power — Ugly, noisy, destructive! Who knew? « Left-handed Complement[…]…

  7. [solarenergy][windturbine][greenenergy][aboutsolarenergy]…

    […]mm204: Wind power — Ugly, noisy, destructive! Who knew? « Left-handed Complement[…]…

  8. Travel Sapa, Cheap Travel Sapa, Sapa Tours 2012…

    […]mm204: Wind power — Ugly, noisy, destructive! Who knew? « Left-handed Complement[…]…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s